Northern Awareness Network Condemns Politicization of EFCC Investigation

The Northern Awareness Network (NAN) strongly condemns the ongoing controversy surrounding Former Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). 

The situation highlights the complexities and politicization that can arise within federal anti-corruption agencies, hindering the pursuit of justice. Former Governor Bello's voluntary appearance at the EFCC headquarters should have been a straightforward process to clear his name.

However, conflicting narratives and inconsistent reports have clouded the case, with rumors of an "arrest" further complicating matters. This unfortunate situation underscores the inefficiencies and confusion that can plague federal anti-graft efforts.

The politicization of anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria is not a new phenomenon, with many high-profile cases being subject to interference and manipulation for political gain. The case of Bello is just the latest example of how these agencies can be used as tools to settle political scores rather than to uphold the rule of law and combat corruption effectively.

In light of these challenges, NAN advocates for the establishment and empowerment of state-owned anti-corruption bodies. The recent law passed by the Lagos State House of Assembly, which restricts external agencies like the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) from investigating cases related to Lagos State's finances and assets, is a significant step towards enhancing autonomy in the fight against corruption.

According to the Chairman Salihu Suleiman, Section 13(3) of the law, which grants the Lagos State Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission authority over such investigations, is a crucial move to address long-standing issues of inefficiency and jurisdictional complexities.

The provision in the new law is a response to concerns over the effectiveness, neutrality, and technicalities of investigations conducted by federal anti-graft bodies. Lagos State, being a key economic player in Nigeria, is particularly susceptible to politically motivated investigations. 

By entrusting the responsibility of anti-corruption investigations to a locally controlled commission, the state is asserting its right to ensure transparency, efficiency, and fairness in handling cases involving its finances.

 This measure is not intended to shield officials from accountability but rather to streamline anti-graft efforts and reduce external interference that often hampers investigations.

One of the primary arguments in support of the new law is its potential to address the issue of frivolous orders and technicalities that impede federal anti-corruption efforts. Federal agencies like the EFCC and ICPC frequently encounter legal challenges and court injunctions that delay or derail corruption investigations.

By transferring investigatory authority to a state-level body, such delays can be mitigated. A locally based commission is better equipped to navigate Lagos State's legal, financial, and administrative frameworks, leading to quicker and more accurate processing of cases. Additionally, the absence of federal overreach and political interference can expedite investigations, serving the public interest more effectively.

By taking charge of their anti-graft initiatives, states can contribute to a more balanced and efficient system of accountability tailored to their specific needs. The law passed by the Lagos State House of Assembly marks a significant step in this direction, signaling a shift towards greater autonomy and effectiveness in combating corruption. 

NAN supports this move and encourages other states to explore similar measures to strengthen their anti-corruption efforts.